I’ve taught a number of doctrinal, writing, clinical, and skills courses. Here are a few examples of learning outcomes I’ve used in recent course syllabi. I don’t offer these as models but instead examples of how I flesh out outcomes in a variety of course types. I include below commentary for particular objectives.
Doctrinal Course: Criminal Law
By the end of the course, you should be able to:
- understand and apply the theories of punishment;
- present and summarize cases in an effective and targeted manner; (This is a particular goal that I work on with students early in the semester. I teach them how to present cases in a manner that cuts to the heart of the issue.)
- articulate basic principles of substantive criminal law as well as specific offenses and defenses;
- spot issues and solve complex criminal law problems under New York law, the common law, and the Model Penal Code;
- craft arguments in support of and in opposition to criminal liability;
- interview police officers, witnesses, and clients to determine appropriate criminal charges; (Even thought this is a doctrinal course, I include skills exercises through flipped-classroom exercises.) and
- work with codes (e.g., New York Penal Law) effectively.
Doctrinal Course: Criminal Procedure
By the end of the course, you should be able to:
- understand the rules that govern arraignment through sentencing in a criminal case
- appreciate and articulate the rationales governing basic rules of “bail to jail” criminal procedure and the Supreme Court precedents in this area
- identify the various pitfalls for unwary prosecutors and defense counsel and know how to avoid them
- argue persuasively at a pretrial release hearing and other proceedings (I use a class meeting to conduct mock bail hearings.)
- appreciate the ethical obligations of prosecutors and defense attorneys (In retrospect, “appreciate” is perhaps not a good word choice. It’s too fuzzy. “Understand” might be better.)
Writing Course: Appellate Advocacy for Moot Court
By the end of the course, you should be able to:
- work effectively in a team; (Because this class is specific for students in our Moot Court Honor Society, I want them to learn how to work together in groups. We talk in class about how to do so.)
- understand and apply standard of review;
- understand and comply with rules of procedure for appellate courts and moot court competitions; (The course focuses on both real world appellate procedure and moot court competitions.)
- research effectively online and in print publications;
- organize an appellate brief involving a sophisticated and complex legal or mixed legal/factual issue;
- compose a brief that is centered around a cohesive and persuasive theme;
- draft effective point headings;
- write effective arguments using effective, concise arguments;
- summarize facts in a persuasive manner;
- write in a clear, legalese-free, and plain manner; and
- conduct an oral argument that is persuasive, conversational, and effective. (This course is ambitious, but students earn 3 credits.)
Writing Course: 1L Legal Writing (Spring Semester)
By the end of this semester, you should be able to:
- research in secondary authorities, statutes, cases, administrative materials, and legislative history, in both state and federal systems;
- conduct research in both print and electronic form;
- articulate the structural and rhetorical differences between objective and persuasive writing;
- craft legal arguments using a variety of persuasive devices;
- cite authorities in Bluebook form;
- write each of the components of an appellate brief;
- present oral argument to a court; and
- continue to spot and analyze basic issues of professional responsibility.